« Schooled By The IPL (14% and 4 In My Head Edition) - May 19-20 | Main | An Unexpected 'Sheed »

May 22, 2008

Comments

Soulberry

John Buchanan suggested it sometime ago. I don't think most cricket watchers understood where he was coming from, including yours truly. Being in the loop, so to speak, he must have understood that there were many cricketers on the table who could be in a position to take advantage of their accidents of birth (I mean the place of, of course!), perhaps migration...early or later. World society has made it possible for people to move around a lot more than they did earlier.

Perhaps the most vulnerable in this regard could be England, for having once had presence in almost all parts of the world, it is quite likely that there will be players somewhere who can trace back roots to England. Then all the immigrations over the years.

Makes for some curious times.

I don't have a problem with sons of immigrants but it does look funny when people migrate just to facilitate their chances of playing for a national team. That in itself isn't wrong since laws permit and other fields also see such movement, but it does look funny at times.

J Rod

Matthew Inness would be a good pick for Zimbabwe.

D.S. Henry

Soulberry, I actually remember Buchanan saying that, because I wrote a post about the insane levels of arrogance the Australian team were reaching at that point.

(http://outsidetheline.typepad.com/outside_the_line/2007/11/neros-spot-migh.html)

Maybe Buchanan was right after all.

The comments to this entry are closed.

April 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30